What Is the Avoidable Consequences Doctrine in California Harassment Cases?
How California Limits Harassment Damages When an Employee Does Not Report Key Takeaways: The avoidable consequences doctrine in California is a damages-reduction rule, not a liability shield, arising from State Department of Health Services v. Superior Court (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1026. Under FEHA, employers remain strictly liable for supervisor harassment, and the doctrine only limits recovery for harm an employee reasonably could have avoided by using internal complaint procedures. The employer carries the full burden under CACI No. 2526 to










